International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 2020; 18(8): 2088-2094
Published online February 4, 2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0214-2
© The International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems
Recently, an impulse vector was introduced as an effective mathematical tool to design and analyze input shapers. In this paper, we generalize the ZV (zero vibration) and ZVD (zero vibration and derivative) shapers by using impulse vectors. The proposed generalized ZVD shaper is defined by letting the ratio m of the third impulse vector magnitude to the first impulse vector magnitude in the impulse vector diagram to be variable. Then two extreme cases of the generalized ZVD shaper are the ZV and ZVD shaper when m = 0 and m = 1, respectively. The generalized ZVD shaper has the performance between ZV and ZVD shaper performance in view of robustness to modeling errors. The validity of the proposed generalized ZVD shaper is demonstrated by simulation and experimental works using an up-and-down flexible beam device.
Keywords Impulse vector, input shaper, input shaping, residual vibration, ZVD shaper.
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 2020; 18(8): 2088-2094
Published online August 1, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0214-2
Copyright © The International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems.
Chul-Goo Kang*, Rubayet Hassan, and Kyung-Youn Kim
Konkuk University
Recently, an impulse vector was introduced as an effective mathematical tool to design and analyze input shapers. In this paper, we generalize the ZV (zero vibration) and ZVD (zero vibration and derivative) shapers by using impulse vectors. The proposed generalized ZVD shaper is defined by letting the ratio m of the third impulse vector magnitude to the first impulse vector magnitude in the impulse vector diagram to be variable. Then two extreme cases of the generalized ZVD shaper are the ZV and ZVD shaper when m = 0 and m = 1, respectively. The generalized ZVD shaper has the performance between ZV and ZVD shaper performance in view of robustness to modeling errors. The validity of the proposed generalized ZVD shaper is demonstrated by simulation and experimental works using an up-and-down flexible beam device.
Keywords: Impulse vector, input shaper, input shaping, residual vibration, ZVD shaper.
Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1~88
Ming-Chang Pai
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems 2011; 9(1): 23-31Brian Byunghyun Kang
International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems 2024; 22(12): 3632-3640Wenbo Huang, Wangqiang Niu*, Hongfen Bai, and Wei Gu
International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems 2024; 22(2): 419-429